Comments on: Download Visual Studio 2008 and Sql Server 2005 for Linq Samples http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/ Linq guide for DEVELOPERS Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:54:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: BomoSpone http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/#comment-17 BomoSpone Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:41:12 +0000 http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/#comment-17 Thanks authors for the reality materials, a lot of the provocative advice. All good. Thanks authors for the reality materials, a lot of the provocative advice. All good.

]]> By: admin http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/#comment-10 admin Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:18:18 +0000 http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/#comment-10 You're right. LINQ to SQL is very easy to use and consists less code. I think developer don't need to write t-sql except from some special cases. I have some apps on facebook. I wrote most of them using previous method but I used Linq to Sql for the last one. I can get the same performance both from the old apps and the new one. You’re right. LINQ to SQL is very easy to use and consists less code.

I think developer don’t need to write t-sql except from some special cases.

I have some apps on facebook. I wrote most of them using previous method but I used Linq to Sql for the last one. I can get the same performance both from the old apps and the new one.

]]> By: Durai karthik http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/#comment-8 Durai karthik Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:58:31 +0000 http://www.linq-to-sql.com/linq-to-sql/t-sql-to-linq-upgrade/linq-download-vs2008-sql2005/#comment-8 I have explored the LINQ to SQL class for my sample shopping cart application . What i felt is , LINQ to SQL is very easy to use and it consists very less code compare to earlier method. Also i used Stored procedures in it. I need some clarification for this. Generally it writes SQL queries in behind the scene. User no need to write T-Sql and all . ok My doubt is , which is the best performer in a run time whether LINQ to SQL or earlier method ? So far i faced one drawback . i.e there is no dataadapter for this . In some case i used to maintain the resultant value of LINQ query in a datatable . i struggled there alone. otherwise very user friendly and less code for development. suggest me . I have explored the LINQ to SQL class for my sample shopping cart application . What i felt is , LINQ to SQL is very easy to use and it consists very less code compare to earlier method. Also i used Stored procedures in it.

I need some clarification for this. Generally it writes SQL queries in behind the scene. User no need to write T-Sql and all . ok

My doubt is , which is the best performer in a run time whether LINQ to SQL or earlier method ?

So far i faced one drawback . i.e there is no dataadapter for this . In some case i used to maintain the resultant value of LINQ query in a datatable . i struggled there alone. otherwise very user friendly and less code for development.

suggest me .

]]>